Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W35xSTQ_370ST
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 455
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
Clevo(1558 3537) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 20.3
13% 16.9 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 15.2
14% 17.5 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 404 401 408 408 407 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 334
Write 414
Mixed 216
SusWrite 405
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 22.6
107% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 137
115% 171 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 106%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
204GB free
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 84.8
Write 85
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 73.3
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W35xSTQ_370ST Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W35xSTQ_370ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback