HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F6
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 11:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 49.8
24% 38.4 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 102
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 82F6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.7
1% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 296 45 227 36 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 307
Write 302
Mixed 271
SusWrite 161
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 25.5
83% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 124
96% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback