MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201010
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 334
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 886
99% 779 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 237
Parallax 294
237% 274 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 240
Splatting 169
193% 246 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 198%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,852
Write 1,167
Mixed 525
259% 1,182 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 48.6
195% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 1,130
DQ Mixed 666
616% 944 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
BR-240G 240GB
73GB free
Firmware: R0801A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 85 81 82 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 491
Write 399
Mixed 410
SusWrite 133
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 15.3
132% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 22.7
82% 176 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 81%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
160GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1359 979 981 981 980 980 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1916
Write 2,108
Mixed 1,698
SusWrite 1,043
380% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 68.4
240% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,479
DQ Write 1,292
DQ Mixed 1,422
1,056% 1,397 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 276%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
82GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 132 109 130 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 120
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 16 15 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 31.9
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 14.3
32% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3866 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 34.1
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 52.6
SC Mixed 33.2
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback