MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B18
MotherboardMSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201010
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 17 '21 at 09:12
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 337
109% 201 Pts
4-Core 674
8-Core 967
103% 820 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
97.3% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 119
Splatting 119
98% 119 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,026
Write 1,322
Mixed 540
284% 1,296 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 48.6
201% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 684
635% 969 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
BR-240G 240GB
73GB free
Firmware: R0801A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 81 78 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 501
Write 434
Mixed 418
SusWrite 131
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 15.7
153% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 21.7
84% 182 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
160GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1355 977 979 979 972 977 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 1,951
Write 2,236
Mixed 1719
SusWrite 1,040
391% 1,736 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 73.5
259% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1789
DQ Write 1,446
DQ Mixed 1,539
1,173% 1,591 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 293%
Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
82GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 133 108 130 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 73
SusWrite 119
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.9 17 14 15 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
9.99% Terrible
Read 38.3
Write 28
Mixed 16.1
SusWrite 12.9
29% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.99%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3866 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 33.6
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 53.9
SC Mixed 35.8
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 48.2
83% 48.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 126%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) Builds (Compare 7,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback