TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81SX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81SX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200210
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 21:18
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 713
76% 604 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 92.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.23
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 84.4
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 80.3
69% 85.6 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 80
Splatting 73.7
67% 82.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
599GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 341 477 266 387 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 582
Mixed 749
SusWrite 365
164% 741 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 12.8
137% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 182
222% 413 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑
This bench: 135%
 Great: 310%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
595GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 106 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 150
Write 98
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 107
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 79%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 105 102 106 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 104
122% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 44.9%
 Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
856GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 139 138 139 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 137
Write 129
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 138
151% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
220% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 67.7%
 Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.4% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 26
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 79.4%
 Great: 164%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81SX Builds (Compare 5,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81SX

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples2,849x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples1,213x
Core i5-9300HFIntelBench 73%, 6,965 samples687x
GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples2,534x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples2,126x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples368x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 156%, 10,396 samples860x
MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBMicronBench 165%, 3,817 samples423x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 198%, 9,460 samples408x
RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples1,022x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples695x
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 76%, 8,736 samples614x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback