Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 21:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 432
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 40
32% 40.7 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 28.5
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
526GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 168 161 161 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 184
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 159
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
517GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 170 171 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 169
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 169
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
878GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 137 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 136
142% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.8
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback