Asus P8Z68-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130509
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 14 '15 at 10:06
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 89
2-Core 152
56% 121 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 240
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4061
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
850PRO_RAID 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.2% Excellent
Read 904
Write 360
Mixed 599
137% 621 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 18.7
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 19.1
24% 41 MB/s
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
108GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 72.3
Write 67.2
Mixed 67.2
52% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.26
66% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 60%
HGST HMS 5C4040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 133
Write 114
Mixed 6.26
93% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.17
78% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
205GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 96.4
Write 106
Mixed 90.9
127% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 3.12
4K Mixed 0.37
121% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 51%
Typical P8Z68-M PRO Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback