Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180511
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 12:34
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 121 2-Core 246 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 437 58% 433 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 42.1 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 40.1 34% 41.6 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 43.8 Splatting 29.1 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 171 175 183 183 178 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Read 425 Write 392 Mixed 340 SusWrite 187 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 50.9 178% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 349 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB 5,027 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 100GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 313 310 311 311 305 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 422 Mixed 405 SusWrite 321 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 95.7 4K Mixed 50.9 169% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 356 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 128%
Intenso Micro Line 32GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 29GB free, PID 2910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.5 7.2 8.4 7.6 8.1 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.43% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 27.3 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 6.8 18% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.43% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB 4,937 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 26 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $741

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16