Acer Veriton S680G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Veriton S680G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EQ57M
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 151
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Acer(1025 0290) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gb0500c4 413 500GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 50 49 43 52 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 50
Write 11
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 48.7
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton S680G Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton S680G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback