Gateway DT50

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGateway DT50  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DT50
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime28.5 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 19:43
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 102
50% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.86% Terrible
Lighting 8.07
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 6.91
7% 8.13 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.85 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 216 220 221 224 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60% Above average
Read 228
Write 195
Mixed 217
SusWrite 215
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 27.8
92% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 177
140% 194 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 60%
Great: 123%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
94GB free
Firmware: VT100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 51 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 53.5
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 51.3
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773DH0-CH9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 0.5
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DT50 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DT50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback