Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 239
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 794
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 1192
74% 1192 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4042) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 279
Parallax 325
238% 298 fps
MRender 340
Gravity 242
Splatting 181
200% 254 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 200%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 360 361 354 348 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 468
Mixed 418
SusWrite 363
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 51
170% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 308
223% 288 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
595GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 1243 1247 1274 1264 1250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1,270
Mixed 1,251
SusWrite 1,252
292% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 54.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 72
231% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 578
426% 556 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 230%
Great: 410%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
709GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 114 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 111
Write 97.9
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 114
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 141 143 143 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 142
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
128GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 95 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 94.6
58% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 61%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 139 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 139
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 139
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
748GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 121 122 119 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 89.7
Write 94
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 119
129% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 34
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 29.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $620
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback