Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration	256 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 185 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 350 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 134 Parallax 129 104% 130 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 132 Splatting 115 99% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 476 Write 460 Mixed 354 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 41.8 133% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 368 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 110GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 122 Write 29.3 Mixed 59 52% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 14GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 75 66 70 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 93 Write 79.5 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 75.9 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 5GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 68 79 79 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 77.2 Write 76 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 72.6 56% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 69GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 130 129 130 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 183 Write 131 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 129 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2 361% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 110%
ST2000DM 001-1E6164 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 847GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 79.5 Write 91.8 Mixed 22.5 79% 64.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 0.4 267% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 66GB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 171 Write 140 Mixed 74.3 152% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 67%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 464GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 61 61 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 109 Write 80 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 60.5 96% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 43%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 26GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 61 61 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 62.8 Write 48 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 60.9 70% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 43%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 22GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 88.5 Write 58.3 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 0.6 58% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston SRT4G86U1-H9H F3-10666CL9-4GBXL V01D3LF4GB26826813 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	161x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	122x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369