Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 403
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 61.3
57% 66.6 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 54.6
51% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 493
Write 401
Mixed 404
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 19.6
120% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 93.5
DQ Mixed 105
69% 78 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
189GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 171
Mixed 146
124% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.19
93% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston 9905471-048.A00LF Kingston 99U5402-052.A00LF 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback