Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 256 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 400 8-Core 707 67% 553 Pts	64-Core 706 44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 2B4E) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 7.4 Parallax 6.5 4% 6.43 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.1 5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 256GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFQE1.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 74 39 93 61 37 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 186 186 188 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 124 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 187 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FE 4x16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	81% Excellent	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 26 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	145x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	94x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	49x

SSD
P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $69Bench 256%, 17,082 samples	36x
Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSabrent $30Bench 152%, 11,181 samples	13x
KingFast 1TBBench 95%, 2,943 samples	10x

RAM
- [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 - [0x9E02] CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S1ME-4 24GBUnknownBench 73%, 68 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	26x
M378A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 65%, 7,811 samples	21x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $155