Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 22 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 376
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 112
Parallax 129
103% 123 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 115
Splatting 107
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 109 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 230
Write 220
Mixed 188
SusWrite 110
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 32.7
110% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 42.9
37% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
357GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 169
Write 227
Mixed 174
SusWrite 111
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 36.5
33% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
31GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 132 132 128 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70% Good
Read 116
Write 129
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 128
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
2GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 130
Mixed 65.7
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
34GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 71 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 94.7
Write 62.9
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 69.4
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB
9GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 20.3
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 15%
WDC WD50 00AAKB-00H8A0 500GB
10GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 23.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 22GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback