Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 20:02
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 59.7
2-Core 148
61% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 383
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 115
Parallax 129
104% 124 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 117
Splatting 108
107% 135 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 98 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 195
Write 218
Mixed 183
SusWrite 106
40% 175 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 32.5
109% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 38.7
35% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 119%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
357GB free
Firmware: SAFM001B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 108 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 167
Write 223
Mixed 171
SusWrite 108
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 28.8
100% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 36.3
33% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
31GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 84.2
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 132
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
2GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 91.5
Mixed 67.1
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
34GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 85.6
Mixed 72
SusWrite 89.6
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB
9GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 28.4
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 20.3
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
WDC WD50 00AAKB-00H8A0 500GB
10GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 24.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 14
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback