Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 774
77% 625 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
Asus(1043 04E6) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 108
0% 56.5 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 41.3
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$101
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 76 76 73 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 461
Write 81.8
Mixed 119
SusWrite 75.6
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 14.3
84% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 113
87% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Neo Forza NMUD480E82-3200D 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 27.9
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 22.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback