Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 21:44
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 449
60% 447 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Asus(1043 04EC) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 116
Reflection 121
Parallax 150
94% 129 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 113
Splatting 81.4
78% 96.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82A7T92C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1788 1774 2061 1939 1722 1591 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,554
Write 2,039
Mixed 1,627
SusWrite 1,812
450% 2008 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 69.5
221% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 1,012
756% 1,010 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 327%
Great: 458%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
921GB free
Firmware: 401100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 342 379 361 336 314 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 379
Mixed 356
SusWrite 347
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 41.2
141% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 164
124% 168 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
24GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 371 380 230 132 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 455
Write 346
Mixed 358
SusWrite 269
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 46.6
149% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 164
124% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 134%
Samsung P3 Portable 1TB
189GB free, PID 61c8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 66.5
Write 47.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 65.5
74% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.5
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback