HP 340S G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP 340S G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C8
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191220
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 20:26
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 186
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 361
45% 344 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 3.5
5% 3.43 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 7.6
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 75 119 117 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 851
Write 128
Mixed 235
SusWrite 106
71% 330 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 36.3
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 172
132% 181 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 192%
Ts512gmt S430S 512GB
375GB free
Firmware: R090
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 88 294 288 277 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 352
Write 306
Mixed 304
SusWrite 256
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 23.5
76% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 83.6
70% 101 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate M3 Portable 3TB
280GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 61 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 60.7
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 58.2
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
220% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 57%
Seagate Basic 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 25 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.7
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 36.5
23% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 65%
SDXC Card 128GB
117GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 9.3 36 37 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 36.9
Write 27.9
Mixed 29
SusWrite 31.3
42% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.8
250% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340S G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 340S G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback