Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 13 '15 at 15:33
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 108
2-Core 204
71% 156 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 578
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 77.1
Parallax 65.1
57% 70.8 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 60.2
54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 345
Write 217
Mixed 273
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 22.4
80% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 84
86% 141 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 108%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 35.1
Mixed 34.7
45% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.36
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 43%
WDC WD50 00AACS-00G8B0 500GB
350GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 33
Mixed 19.7
35% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18%
Great: 26%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
147GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 26.1
Mixed 10
27% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.38
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 19%
HDT72252 5DLAT80 250GB
125GB free, PID 0829
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 12.1
26% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.34
83% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback