Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 22:38
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 755
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 52.8
44% 54.3 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 49
Splatting 44.7
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM164 1TB
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 121 123 131 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 158
Write 148
Mixed 108
SusWrite 121
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 859B CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback