Casper EXCALIBUR G900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G900  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER NLCB 001
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 20:17
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 854
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1287) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 91
73% 92.3 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 83.7
Splatting 83
74% 91 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 60 149 78 113 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 458
Write 316
Mixed 338
SusWrite 137
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 32.5
123% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 206
177% 261 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
266GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 98 98 98 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 137
Write 136
Mixed 55
SusWrite 99.1
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G900 Builds (Compare 984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback