MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 17:32
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 97.2
48% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 196
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 35.6
21% 34.9 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 20
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
663GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 184
Write 121
Mixed 29.9
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S V2 (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback