Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 17:00
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 780
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 174
Parallax 178
143% 176 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 158
Splatting 130
129% 162 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1193 310 304 303 302 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1712
Write 1,446
Mixed 584
SusWrite 452
233% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 49.8
189% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1156
DQ Write 1,269
DQ Mixed 669
654% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 208%
Great: 236%
Intel SSDPE2ME400G4 400GB
204GB free
Firmware: 8DV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 469 471 469 470 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 448
Mixed 410
SusWrite 467
129% 585 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 45.3
230% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 651
538% 794 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 176%
Great: 176%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
633GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 448 450 457 457 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 460
Mixed 415
SusWrite 449
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 63.5
213% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Mushkin MKNSSDCR240GB-7 1TB
348GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 9,269
Write 8,810
Mixed 8,875
2,008% 8,985 MB/s
4K Read 803
4K Write 364
4K Mixed 422
1,950% 530 MB/s
DQ Read 1,958
DQ Write 1,286
DQ Mixed 1,372
1,091% 1,539 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 30.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 39.8
SC Mixed 28.9
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback