Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 330
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,122
106% 879 Pts
64-Core 1572
97% 1572 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.12.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 258
Parallax 546
229% 362 fps
MRender 388
Gravity 202
Splatting 290
238% 293 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 206%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1995
Write 1,375
Mixed 982
320% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 85.6
297% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1,114
884% 1,233 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
166GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 220 221 222 220 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 450
Mixed 367
SusWrite 238
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 50.6
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 147
111% 150 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 105%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 52 52 53 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 98
Write 98.3
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 52.4
20% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 11.1
38% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 71.5
54% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 71%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 6.5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 36 35 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 95.6
Write 96
Mixed 98
SusWrite 36.5
18% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 11.2
34% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 32.1
DQ Mixed 59.2
47% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 25%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 91.1
Write 54.6
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 23.7
15% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 11.1
36% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 69.2
52% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 43.9
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 38.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback