Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 12:55
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 167
2-Core 331
107% 197 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,089
105% 865 Pts
64-Core 1587
98% 1587 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 74.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 544
61% 235 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 202
Splatting 290
166% 189 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,990
Write 1,364
Mixed 980
319% 1,445 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 86.6
299% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1,211
DQ Mixed 1,071
864% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
166GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 221 224 221 222 221 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 450
Mixed 370
SusWrite 239
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 50.9
176% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 199
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 105%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 52 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 96.7
Write 97.4
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 51.5
19% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 11.3
37% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 73
54% 73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 71%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 6.5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 37 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 97.2
Write 95.9
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 38.9
18% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 10.2
31% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 60.6
47% 67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 25%
Qnap iSCSI Storage 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 24 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 97
Write 97.7
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 22.2
18% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 10.5
32% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 38.5
DQ Mixed 70
53% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 26%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 9.9 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 17.7
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 11.2
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 2.9
258% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 44.7
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 44.5
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback