Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030U 24,177 User benchmarks, average bench 45% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 91.5 44% 70.2 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 148 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 06AD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 5.69 3% 4.97 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 6.39 4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SDSSDA120G 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 87GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	Read 36.2 Write 27.2 Mixed 28.5 38% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.91 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 2.08 468% 6.64 MB/s	DQ Read 8.89 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 2.36 554% 8.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 58%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-75ZCT2 320GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 59GB free (System drive), PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 0420 F3-1600C9-4GRSL 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,306x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	322x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	308x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	364x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	122x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	119x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16