Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 87.5
1-Core 145
2-Core 285
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 864
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,156
72% 1,156 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
XFX(1682 9270) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 30.7
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 39.5
25% 34.5 fps
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 23
22% 26 fps
Poor: 22% Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,507
Write 10,258
Mixed 9,978
2,221% 9,914 MB/s
4K Read 216
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 190
672% 199 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 837
639% 866 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
192GB free
Firmware: UF2204RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,807
Write 10597
Mixed 10,133
2,280% 10179 MB/s
4K Read 236
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 218
752% 224 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 581
435% 577 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
171GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,943
Write 8,808
Mixed 9,312
2,019% 9,021 MB/s
4K Read 226
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 220
737% 219 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 907
681% 909 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
870GB free
Firmware: JC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,059
Write 9862
Mixed 9,164
6,812% 9,028 MB/s
4K Read 223
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 209
36,434% 214 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 575
5,286% 577 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: GGBOAH20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,066
Write 11062
Mixed 9,948
7,556% 10,025 MB/s
4K Read 223
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 222
37,783% 217 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 578
5,300% 578 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
WD My Book 500GB
203GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 19%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 36.2
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 15.4
38% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 22%
I-O DATA HDPH-UT 1TB
217GB free, PID 0168
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
40GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 34.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 37.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback