Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 157 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Memory 52.3 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 28.8 25% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 33.2 8-Core 35.6 5% 34.4 Pts	64-Core 39.9 2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 17E2) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2 1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SMI DISK 253GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0823B SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 204 211 229 198 232 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 306 Write 293 Mixed 254 SusWrite 216 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 15.5 52% 17.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 69.7 DQ Mixed 32.4 29% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5673EH1-CF8 4GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 667, 533 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 27%, 157 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	4x

SSD
64GB 64GBSSDBench 72%, 2 samples	1x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
HMT325S6EFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 6GBHynixBench 40%, 15 samples	1x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,616 samples	1x