Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 09:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 210
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 190
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240
Dell(1028 210B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 10.7
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 4.3
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 145 157 173 186 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 438
Mixed 315
SusWrite 170
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.1
182% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 302
232% 317 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
376GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 113 116 118 120 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 149
Write 134
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 119
76% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 77%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-DS2 Builds (Compare 3,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-DS2 - $51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback