Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M3N-HT DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 06:26
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 55.9
38% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 118
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia nForce 980a/780a SLI
Asus(1043 82E7) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.65 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 168
Write 78.8
Mixed 93.9
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 7
34% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 46.8
DQ Write 34.5
DQ Mixed 19.4
20% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 61%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 129
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.2
91% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
878GB free
Firmware: 82.0
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 111
Write 85.4
Mixed 81.8
69% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
780GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 94.2
Write 50
Mixed 91.5
60% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.12
51% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 67%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86
457GB free
Firmware: 82.0
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 111
Mixed 106
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.17
79% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 100%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
299GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 55.6
Write 68.2
Mixed 71
49% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.31
80% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
206GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 88
Write 77.8
Mixed 80.2
62% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.32
96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
114GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 42.9
Mixed 71.4
52% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.4
92% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3N-HT DELUXE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback