Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO X70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime45.8 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 00:20
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 185
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 61.2
30% 179 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 5.5
2% 9 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTTAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 244 217 193 200 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 342
Write 340
Mixed 357
SusWrite 215
71% 313 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 38.9
111% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 289
203% 262 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
397GB free
Firmware: GH2OA900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 117 116 118 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 105
Write 94.3
Mixed 30
SusWrite 116
63% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
463GB free
Firmware: GH2OA900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 12.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 13.3
7% 9.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73CB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 M471B1G73CB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 15.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 13.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO X70-A Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO X70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback