HP Zbook 17 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Zbook 17 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2255
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190829
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 17:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 135
56% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 340
30% 256 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD6PP4M-256G-1006 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A200806
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 386 356 339 314 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 588
Write 411
Mixed 260
SusWrite 350
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 25.6
85% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 422
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 138
162% 284 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 103%
Hitachi HTS721075A9E630 750GB
411GB free
Firmware: JB2OA3K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 89 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 88
Write 95
Mixed 20
SusWrite 89.4
53% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 M471B5173EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 14.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zbook 17 G2 Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Zbook 17 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback