MSI B450M BAZOOKA PLUS (MS-7B90)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B90
MotherboardMSI B450M BAZOOKA PLUS (MS-7B90)  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200612
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 08:31
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 183
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 674
62% 518 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 63.5
53% 66.4 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 55.8
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 250GB SSD 250GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 350 86 42 113 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 428
Mixed 157
SusWrite 179
116% 537 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 34.6
194% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 372
332% 489 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 147%
Great: 209%
Kingston SVP180S2256G 256GB
139GB free
Firmware: CJRA0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 182 181 184 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 210
Write 192
Mixed 117
SusWrite 182
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 27.8
90% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 35.6
29% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 47%
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
148GB free
Firmware: EMT04L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 289 292 292 292 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 295
Mixed 266
SusWrite 290
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 40.4
152% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 249
212% 310 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HCC545050A7E380 500GB
241GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 91 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 93.6
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 92.8
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
310GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 182 182 182 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 174
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 181
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 32.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M BAZOOKA PLUS (MS-7B90) Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B450M BAZOOKA PLUS (MS-7B90)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback