Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime29.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 171
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 316
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 75.7
40% 61.5 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 44
43% 54 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 339 300 327 316 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 320
Write 340
Mixed 246
SusWrite 322
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 27.2
95% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 36.3
37% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 101%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
11GB free
Firmware: 1.01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 302
Write 336
Mixed 235
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 26
95% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 35
36% 55.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
1TB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 134 135 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 134
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 75%
Garmin GARMIN SD Card 16GB
5GB free, PID 26c8
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.2
Mixed 0.5
0% 0.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1600 CL9 Series 8502 1600EL Series 8502 1600 CL9 Series 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback