HP 750-175se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 750-175se  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '17 at 00:44
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 655
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
HP(103C 2B4D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 36.1
34% 39.7 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 33.1
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 395
Write 329
Mixed 354
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 26.9
123% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 61.8
103% 200 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 101%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 5.83
Mixed 6.85
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.71
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.002
10% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GRR Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 0420 F4-2133C15-8GRR Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.9% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23.6
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-175se Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: HP 750-175se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback