Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 242
69% 131 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 612
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5671
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 50.6
54% 58.6 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 37.1
37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 205 216 214 230 237 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1012
Write 1,169
Mixed 542
SusWrite 227
165% 738 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 49.9
143% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 504
438% 662 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 133%
Great: 228%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
656GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 466 567 578 574 586 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 492
Write 565
Mixed 482
SusWrite 553
118% 523 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 21.8
70% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 106
82% 111 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.6% Below average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback