Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 599
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 747
46% 747 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
109% 137 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 144
Splatting 121
104% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 410 416 420 417 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 481
Mixed 384
SusWrite 419
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 47.7
163% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 242
214% 322 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
726GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 234 233 233 234 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
81.9% Excellent
Read 245
Write 230
Mixed 232
SusWrite 234
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 47.9
157% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 133%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 235 234 235 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
78.2% Very good
Read 246
Write 230
Mixed 223
SusWrite 234
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 42.4
145% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 198
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$112
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 173 170 172 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 171
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback