HP h9-1210eo

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP h9-1210eo (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '21 at 16:24
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 73.7 1-Core 94 2-Core 189 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 347 46% 347 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.5 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 21.1 18% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000 120GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 32 29 26 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 426 Write 23.8 Mixed 82 SusWrite 38.4 30% 143 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 14.4 4K Mixed 17.2 46% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 35.8 38% 67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 54%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 126GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 47 48 49 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 53.5 Write 51.8 Mixed 39 SusWrite 48.4 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 8358 TMS4GB364E081139EE 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.4% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 7.6 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1210eo Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP h9-1210eo

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
PSD38G16002 1x8GBPatriotBench 28%, 4,186 samples	1x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C8 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 1,215 samples	1x
CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 16GBUnknownBench 52%, 3 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16