| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 15% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121220 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 09:42 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 40% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.1%
Above average
|
53% 88.1 Pts
|
34% 250 Pts
|
16% 254 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Zotac(19DA 1265) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
24% 33.8 fps
|
30% 36.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot Burst 240GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMK1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 11 31 11 24 22 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
17% 76.7 MB/s
|
25% 6.83 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
63GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 66 65 66 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
59% 79.9 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.1%
Below average
|
34% 11.9 GB/s
|
30% 10.7 GB/s
|
44% 91.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,016 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 110x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 84x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |