PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H410M-HDV (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200810 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 07 '21 at 05:01 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
70.2%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36BD) 2GB
CLim: 1555 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 227 22 66 57 30 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
82GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 75 75 75 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 7EH64AA# 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 200x |
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 165x |
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 162x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 60x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 55x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $327 |