Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3540 17,036 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 50.4 32% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 99.4 8-Core 99.8 13% 99.6 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0905) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.1 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 209 197 58 58 59 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.1% Above average	Read 233 Write 214 Mixed 202 SusWrite 132 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 27.1 103% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 121 103% 149 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 91%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35 9,368 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 61GB free Firmware: 0010SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 83 82 83 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 83.5 Write 87.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 82.5 55% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 50%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 7GB free, PID 0001, SDXC Card 128гб Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.6 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.9 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	6.17% Terrible	Read 25.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.2 9% 9.57 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KVR16LS11/8 1x8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	11x
Pentium N3530IntelBench 35%, 5,111 samples	4x
Celeron N2930IntelBench 34%, 2,000 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	22x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
SSDNow V+200 Series 120GBKingstonBench 72%, 853 samples	1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	7x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x
ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 7,765 samples	2x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16