ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160527
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 23:07
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 95.4 1-Core 114 2-Core 231 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 727 72% 587 Pts	64-Core 901 56% 901 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 146 Parallax 127 116% 139 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 140 Splatting 110 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 1,330 Write 923 Mixed 1,001 241% 1,085 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 27 94% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 395 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 120 152% 273 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 254%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 100GB free Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10005 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1623 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 267 (AE) Unknown 100 100 224 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 49 219043332134 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 14405275931 (F7) Unknown 100 100 18181893 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3751980142	63.2% Good	Read 489 Write 272 Mixed 350 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 11.8 58% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 49.3 84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 62GB free Firmware: DXM03B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13000 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2461 (B1) Unknown 81 81 688 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 49 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2808 (EB) Unknown 99 99 440 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3463187942	71.7% Very good	Read 510 Write 268 Mixed 363 84% 380 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 19.6 79% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 58.1 95% 184 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 24GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3586801 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -85968065396060 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 210 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 135 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 45 85902295073 (C2) HDA temperature 33 45 85902295073 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3586801 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3586801 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3586801 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 255 (EA) Unknown 0 0 106 (F1) Unknown 0 0 106 (F2) Unknown 0 0 27 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1703954	49.8% Average	Read 501 Write 135 Mixed 213 62% 283 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 13.8 66% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 53.7 DQ Mixed 9.97 16% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 12GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1798 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 451 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 56 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3342196603	84.5% Excellent	Read 505 Write 404 Mixed 414 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 27.5 92% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 102 116% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 115%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 71 157180646 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 683 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 71 60 13207383 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -59261958749549 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 119 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 65 487915548 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 552 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2100 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 81604378652 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -111707804401520 (F1) Unknown 100 253 456007921 (F2) Unknown 100 253 226930111	94% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 149 Mixed 131 114% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.25 97% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK 32GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 56.9 MC Mixed 44.8 137% 48 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 20.4 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 55.8 72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback