ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	EVGA Default string
Motherboard	EVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 13 '17 at 20:19
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 223 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 754 74% 604 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 145 Parallax 143 121% 145 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 146 Splatting 112 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 384GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,325 Write 925 Mixed 1,022 242% 1,091 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 32.8 141% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 404 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 21.9 110% 252 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 254%
Crucial M500 240GB-$79 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 223GB free Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9376 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1553 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 92 92 266 (AE) Unknown 100 100 200 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 49 219043332127 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 92 92 8 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 13948992757 (F7) Unknown 100 100 3911191 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3741937882	69.6% Good	Read 490 Write 273 Mixed 353 82% 372 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 21.3 76% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 53.4 86% 165 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 112GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1166 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 380 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2936113777	93.8% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 403 Mixed 417 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 30.9 119% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 316 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 104 127% 223 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 115%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 66GB free Firmware: DXM03B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12403 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2390 (B1) Unknown 81 81 688 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 49 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 97 97 2808 (EB) Unknown 99 99 417 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3430177238	78.8% Very good	Read 515 Write 327 Mixed 338 87% 393 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 19.7 89% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 57.6 99% 194 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 110%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 24GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 11611116 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18176301596716 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 139 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 111 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 45 94492229659 (C2) HDA temperature 27 45 94492229659 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11611116 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11611116 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11611116 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 207 (EA) Unknown 0 0 102 (F1) Unknown 0 0 102 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1703953	56.9% Above average	Read 503 Write 135 Mixed 214 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 12.2 81% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 88.6 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 9.95 36% 78 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 73%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3.5TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 71 195295006 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 72 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4424515 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 75295071666204 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 68 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 65 454557722 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 40 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 164 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 85899345946 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -114860310396909 (F1) Unknown 100 253 183730338 (F2) Unknown 100 253 11564668	92.9% Outstanding	Read 153 Write 171 Mixed 133 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.29 96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRK F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRKD F4-3200C16-4GRK 32GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	MC Read 42.8 MC Write 57 MC Mixed 44.9 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 21.3 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback