Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160329
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '17 at 15:11
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 152
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 464
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2862 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 179
Parallax 171
107% 160 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 178
Splatting 130
119% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 484
Write 390
Mixed 398
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 21.4
116% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.1
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 21.7
26% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
80GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 494
Write 101
Mixed 138
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 14.2
82% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 29.8
DQ Write 74.2
DQ Mixed 13.9
22% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 73%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$45
1TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 109
Write 144
Mixed 124
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 5.34
4K Mixed 0.69
203% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 162
Mixed 155
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.32
123% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
824GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 160
125% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.35
124% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 168
Mixed 96.7
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 5.39
4K Mixed 0.64
205% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
461GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 42
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.27
89% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 17
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $638
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback