Foxconn H61MX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H61MX  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 05 '21 at 00:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 345
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1606 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 25.8
20% 24.3 fps
MRender 30.8
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 20.9
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 71 39 72 59 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 202
Write 188
Mixed 169
SusWrite 63.7
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 21.8
80% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 28.4
26% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 80%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
147GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 141 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 119
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 151
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0 M378B5173QH0 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MX Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $86
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback