Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '21 at 22:46
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Memory 94.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 264 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 731 79% 630 Pts	64-Core 784 48% 784 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8591) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 150 Parallax 141 112% 143 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 144 Splatting 128 108% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 431 449 456 459 459 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 376 Mixed 384 SusWrite 450 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 41.6 154% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 192 171% 253 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 100%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB 7,008 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 372GB free Firmware: STZSE014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 459 483 483 486 490 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 485 Mixed 398 SusWrite 480 105% 464 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 129 4K Mixed 26.1 122% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 47.1 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 72 92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,524 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 24.8 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 24.6 70% 24.5 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,647x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,246x
Core i7-9700KIntel $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	852x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	490x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	434x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	303x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	221x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	145x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	366x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	174x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	165x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $422

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16