Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5400-$75 14,795 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Intel, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 44 1-Core 33.7 2-Core 60.8 29% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 68.4 8-Core 74.2 9% 71.3 Pts	64-Core 71.5 4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i 395 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0158) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.83 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.13 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.07% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 86.5 Write 77.6 Mixed 78.9 61% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.21 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.15 44% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU342G0ALEPR692C6F 1x2GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.82% Terrible	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 0 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.1 2% 0.77 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	5x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $131Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	4x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 7100 / nForce 630iNvidiaBench 0%, 395 samples	4x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
SVP200S37A1 120GBKingstonBench 33%, 30 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,606 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 2x2GBNanyaBench 14%, 164 samples	5x
75.A73AA.G06 2x2GBApacerBench 13%, 16 samples	5x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $75