TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Notebook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81F0
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160414
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 17:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 84.1
47% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 138
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 81F0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.6
0% 4.03 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.5
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 1.46%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPVX-60JC3T0 1TB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 35 42 44 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 84.8
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 36.2
40% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 30.2%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
0, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.4
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 13.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 47.6%
 Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 7,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples1,151x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples1,034x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples993x
GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples2,517x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples1,751x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples1,185x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples250x
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples155x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples151x
RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples402x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples379x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples349x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback