Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '21 at 00:28
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 436
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.9 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 205 60 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 250
Write 128
Mixed 209
SusWrite 117
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 23.9
90% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 148
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 101
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 9.5 9.4 9.4 8.1 9.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 5.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 8.6
12% 9.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback